io.netty:netty-codec-http2

CVE-2025-55163

CVE-2025-55163 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http2 (maven), affecting versions >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, <= 4.2.3.Final. It is fixed in 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final, 1.75.0.

Key facts
CVSS score
7.5
High
Attack vector
Network
Issuing authority
GitHub Advisory Database
Affected package
io.netty:netty-codec-http2
Fixed in
4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final, 1.75.0
Disclosed
2025

Summary

Below is a technical explanation of a newly discovered vulnerability in HTTP/2, which we refer to as “MadeYouReset.” MadeYouReset Vulnerability Summary The MadeYouReset DDoS vulnerability is a logical vulnerability in the HTTP/2 protocol, that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames in order to break the max concurrent streams limit - which results in resource exhaustion and distributed denial of service. Mechanism The vulnerability uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames, or malformed flow, in order to make the server reset streams created by the client (using the RSTSTREAM frame). The vulnerability could be triggered by several primitives, defined by the RFC of HTTP/2 (RFC 9113). The Primitives are: WINDOWUPDATE frame with an increment of 0 or an increment that makes the window exceed 2^31 - 1. (section 6.9 + 6.9.1) HEADERS or DATA frames sent on a half-closed (remote) stream (which was closed using the ENDSTREAM flag). (note that for some implementations it's possible a CONTINUATION frame to trigger that as well - but it's very rare). (Section 5.1) PRIORITY frame with a length other than 5. (section 6.3) From our experience, the primitives are likely to exist in the decreasing order listed above. Note that based on the implementation of the library, other primitives (which are not defined by the RFC) might exist - meaning scenarios in which RSTSTREAM is not supposed to be sent, but in the implementation it does. On the other hand - some RFC-defined primitives might not work, even though they are defined by the RFC (as some implementations are not fully complying with RFC). For example, some implementations we’ve seen discard the PRIORITY frame - and thus does not return RSTSTREAM, and some implementations send GOAWAY when receiving a WINDOWUPDATE frame with increment of 0. The vulnerability takes advantage of a design flaw in the HTTP/2 protocol - While HTTP/2 has a limit on the number of concurrently active streams per connection (which is usually 100, and is set by the parameter SETTINGSMAXCONCURRENTSTREAMS), the number of active streams is not counted correctly - when a stream is reset, it is immediately considered not active, and thus unaccounted for in the active streams counter. While the protocol does not count those streams as active, the server’s backend logic still processes and handles the requests that were canceled. Thus, the attacker can exploit this vulnerability to cause the server to handle an unbounded number of concurrent streams from a client on the same connection. The exploitation is very simple: the client issues a request in a stream, and then sends the control frame that causes the server to send a RSTSTREAM. Attack Flow For example, a possible attack scenario can be: Attacker opens an HTTP/2 connection to the server. Attacker sends HEADERS frame with ENDSTREAM flag on a new stream X. Attacker sends WINDOWUPDATE for stream X with flow-control window of 0. The server receives the WINDOWUPDATE and immediately sends RSTSTREAM for stream X to the client (+ decreases the active streams counter by 1). The attacker can repeat steps 2+3 as rapidly as it is capable, since the active streams counter never exceeds 1 and the attacker does not need to wait for the response from the server. This leads to resource exhaustion and distributed denial of service vulnerabilities with an impact of: CPU overload and/or memory exhaustion (implementation dependent) Comparison to Rapid Reset The vulnerability takes advantage of a design flow in the HTTP/2 protocol that was also used in the Rapid Reset vulnerability (CVE-2023-44487) which was exploited as a zero-day in the wild in August 2023 to October 2023, against multiple services and vendors. The Rapid Reset vulnerability uses RSTSTREAM frames sent from the client, in order to create an unbounded amount of concurrent streams - it was given a CVSS score of 7.5. Rapid Reset was mostly mitigated by limiting the number/rate of RSTSTREAM sent from the client, which does not mitigate the MadeYouReset attack - since it triggers the server to send a RSTSTREAM. Suggested Mitigations for MadeYouReset A quick and easy mitigation will be to limit the number/rate of RSTSTREAMs sent from the server. It is also possible to limit the number/rate of control frames sent by the client (e.g. WINDOWUPDATE and PRIORITY), and treat protocol flow errors as a connection error. As mentioned in our previous message, this is a protocol-level vulnerability that affects multiple vendors and implementations. Given its broad impact, it is the shared responsibility of all parties involved to handle the disclosure process carefully and coordinate mitigations effectively. If you have any questions, we will be happy to clarify or schedule a Zoom call. Gal, Anat and Yaniv.

Impact

What is allocation of resources without limits or throttling?

The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap. Typical impact: resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.

Severity and exposure

CVE-2025-55163 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment.

A fixed version is available (4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final, 1.75.0). Upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

maven

  • io.netty:netty-codec-http2 (>= 4.2.0.Alpha1, <= 4.2.3.Final)
  • io.netty:netty-codec-http2 (<= 4.1.123.Final)
  • io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded (< 1.75.0)

Security releases

  • io.netty:netty-codec-http2 → 4.2.4.Final (maven)
  • io.netty:netty-codec-http2 → 4.1.124.Final (maven)
  • io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded → 1.75.0 (maven)
Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter instead of chasing every advisory.

Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether CVE-2025-55163 is reachable in your applications. Explore open-source security for your team.

See if CVE-2025-55163 is reachable in your applications. Get a demo

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

  • Upgrade io.netty:netty-codec-http2 to 4.2.4.Final or later
  • Upgrade io.netty:netty-codec-http2 to 4.1.124.Final or later
  • Upgrade io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded to 1.75.0 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-55163

What is CVE-2025-55163?

CVE-2025-55163 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http2 (maven), affecting versions >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, <= 4.2.3.Final. It is fixed in 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final, 1.75.0. The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap.

How severe is CVE-2025-55163?

CVE-2025-55163 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.

Which packages are affected by CVE-2025-55163?
  • io.netty:netty-codec-http2 (maven) (versions >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, <= 4.2.3.Final)
  • io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded (maven) (versions < 1.75.0)
Is there a fix for CVE-2025-55163?

Yes. CVE-2025-55163 is fixed in 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final, 1.75.0. Upgrade to this version or later.

Is CVE-2025-55163 exploitable, and should I be worried?

Whether CVE-2025-55163 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo

What actually determines whether CVE-2025-55163 is exploitable, and how bad it is?

Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.

How do I fix CVE-2025-55163?
  • Upgrade io.netty:netty-codec-http2 to 4.2.4.Final or later
  • Upgrade io.netty:netty-codec-http2 to 4.1.124.Final or later
  • Upgrade io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded to 1.75.0 or later

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.