Breaking the Developer Security Mold

Modern software development prioritizes speed and agility, but this often comes at the cost of security. The 2025 Kodem Security Report found that 62% of organizations struggle with remediation delays, taking over four weeks to fix critical vulnerabilities, while 78% use five or more security tools, leading to fragmentation and inefficiencies [1]. Additionally, 87% of security professionals report alert fatigue, with excessive false positives slowing down effective response times [1]. These findings reflect a broader industry problem: security is still reactive, slow, and overly reliant on developer-driven fixes.

This paper argues that the current model of developer-led security is inherently flawed and must evolve toward a specialized, automated, and infrastructure-centric approach. We propose four key shifts:

1. Automated threat detection and response to reduce reliance on manual fixes.
2. Security-aware infrastructure, such as immutable and ephemeral computing environments.
3. External security validation via bug bounties and penetration testing.
4. Shifting security ownership beyond developers by embedding security across QA, DevOps, and business leadership.

The following sections examine why developer-led security is failing, present recent high-profile security breaches, and explore alternative strategies that address these persistent challenges.

‍

The Limitations of Developer-Led Security

A. Fragmented Security Tooling and Visibility

According to the 2025 Kodem Security Report, 54% of security leaders lack a unified platform to manage vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle (SDLC), leading to redundancies and inefficiencies [1]. This fragmentation forces developers to juggle multiple tools—Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and runtime monitoring—without a cohesive security strategy.

‍

B. Remediation Delays and Developer Burnout

Security leaders cite remediation as the biggest bottleneck, with an average of 22 days to fix critical vulnerabilities, leaving applications exposed to attackers for extended periods [1]. 77% of security teams report challenges working with developers, as engineers prioritize feature delivery over security fixes due to business pressures [1].

C. Incomplete Shift-Left Security Adoption

While 73% of organizations have adopted shift-left security, only 35% believe it effectively reduces risk at scale [1]. The primary issue is that shift-left security assumes developers have the bandwidth and expertise to proactively prevent security issues, yet in reality, their primary focus remains functionality and performance.

D. Inability to Address Runtime and API Threats

The 2025 Kodem Security Report highlights a 45% year-over-year increase in runtime security adoption, reflecting the growing need to secure applications in production rather than relying solely on pre-deployment security measures [1]. APIs are a major attack vector, with 52% of organizations encountering API-specific threats in the past 12 months [1]. Traditional developer-driven security fails to address real-world exploitability, zero-day attacks, and runtime threats that only emerge once applications are live.

Case Studies
Recent Failures of Developer-Led Security

A. MOVEit Data Breach (2023)

The MOVEit file transfer vulnerability, exploited by the Clop ransomware group, resulted in over 62 million compromised records due to a zero-day SQL injection flaw [2]. Despite SQL injection being one of the most well-documented vulnerabilities in software security, it persisted due to insufficient developer oversight and a lack of runtime security controls.

B. CircleCI Secret Leak (2023)

A major breach at CircleCI led to attackers stealing customer environment secrets and encryption keys, highlighting the risks of relying solely on developers to implement secure credential management [3]. This incident underscores the need for infrastructure-level protections such as automated secret rotation and ephemeral environments.

C. Okta Support System Breach (2023)

Okta, a leading identity provider, suffered a support system compromise, resulting in unauthorized access to customer credentials [4]. This breach was not a code vulnerability but a security workflow failure, demonstrating that application security must extend beyond development teams to operational security processes.

D. 2024 XZ Utils Backdoor (Supply Chain Attack)

A backdoor was stealthily introduced into XZ Utils, a widely used Linux compression tool, affecting major distributions [5]. The attack went undetected in open-source repositories for months, proving that developer-driven security alone cannot prevent sophisticated supply chain threats.

‍

These cases illustrate systemic failures in modern application security, reinforcing the argument that a developer-centric approach is inadequate for addressing today’s evolving threat landscape.

Alternative Security Strategies:
Beyond Developer Fixes

If developer-led security is failing, then what does a better approach look like? The answer lies in shifting away from a reactive, developer-dependent model toward one that leverages automation, infrastructure security, external validation, and a broader security culture across the organization. Instead of expecting developers to fix every vulnerability manually, organizations need solutions that work with them, reducing cognitive load, minimizing false positives, and addressing security risks before they become business crises.

A. Automating Threat Detection and Response

One of the most promising shifts in security is the rise of automated threat detection and response mechanisms that operate in real-time, catching and mitigating vulnerabilities that developers might miss or deprioritize. Unlike traditional security tools that rely on scanning code during development, these solutions monitor applications at runtime, identifying anomalies and responding to exploits as they occur.

Application Detection and Response (ADR) is emerging as a critical layer of defense. Much like how endpoint detection and response (EDR) revolutionized security at the operating system level, ADR continuously monitors an application’s behavior, looking for signs of abuse, unauthorized access, or exploit attempts. When a threat is detected, ADR can automatically isolate compromised services or block malicious requests, significantly reducing dwell time for attackers.

Alongside ADR, Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) is gaining traction as a zero-day mitigation tool. Instead of relying on developers to patch every security hole immediately, RASP actively prevents exploits by dynamically analyzing application behavior in real-time. For example, if an attacker attempts to exploit an SQL injection vulnerability in a production system, RASP can block the request before it reaches the database—even if the underlying code remains vulnerable.

To complement real-time detection and blocking, auto-remediation systems are also gaining adoption, particularly in managing third-party dependencies. Many security breaches stem not from first-party code, but from outdated or compromised open-source libraries. These systems proactively identify, patch, and test vulnerabilities in software dependencies, ensuring applications remain secure without requiring developers to manually triage and apply fixes. The 2025 Kodem Security Report found that organizations adopting auto-remediation cut their vulnerability fix times by 50%, demonstrating how automation can outpace traditional manual patching workflows [1].

B. Rethinking Security at the Infrastructure Level

Beyond securing individual applications, infrastructure-aware security is transforming the way organizations defend against modern threats. Instead of relying on developers to continuously fix vulnerabilities, many forward-thinking security teams are redesigning infrastructure itself to minimize the risk of persistent attacks.

One of the most effective approaches is immutable and ephemeral computing, where application instances are not patched—they are replaced. Rather than relying on developers to manually update vulnerable systems, ephemeral infrastructure ensures that compromised components are automatically discarded and rebuilt from a secure baseline. This approach is particularly effective in cloud-native and containerized environments, where workloads can be recreated within seconds, drastically reducing the attack surface.

Similarly, secure-by-default frameworks are shifting security responsibilities away from developers by embedding security best practices directly into programming environments. By enforcing strict access controls, input validation, and encryption policies at the framework level, these solutions prevent entire categories of vulnerabilities from ever reaching production. When security is built into the tools developers already use, there is less reliance on individuals remembering to follow best practices—security simply becomes the default.

C. Bringing in External Expertise:
Bug Bounties and Security Audits

Even with automated security and hardened infrastructure, attackers will always seek new weaknesses. This is why external security validation is a crucial component of a modern security strategy. Organizations cannot rely solely on internal security teams or developer self-assessments—they need external perspectives to catch blind spots and emerging threats.

One approach is through bug bounty programs, which leverage crowdsourced security testing to uncover vulnerabilities before malicious actors do. Companies like Apple, Google, and Microsoft have paid millions of dollars in bug bounties to ethical hackers who discover and report security flaws before they can be exploited [9]. The advantage of bug bounties is scale—no in-house security team can match the sheer volume of independent security researchers testing an application in real-world conditions.

Beyond bounties, third-party security audits and penetration testing provide an unbiased review of an organization’s security posture. Unlike developer-led security reviews, external auditors bring fresh perspectives, specialized knowledge, and real-world attack simulations to uncover vulnerabilities that might otherwise go unnoticed. The 2025 Kodem Security Report found that organizations conducting regular third-party security audits reduced their critical vulnerability exposure by 40% compared to those relying solely on internal security reviews [1].

D. Expanding Security Ownership Beyond Developers

A final, yet critical, shift in security strategy is broadening security responsibility beyond just developers. Application security should not be the sole domain of engineering teams; rather, it should be integrated across QA, DevOps, product management, and even executive leadership.

One way to achieve this is through Security Champions Programs—not just within development teams, but across all business units. Instead of expecting every developer to be a security expert, organizations can identify key individuals in each department who are responsible for security advocacy, training, and coordination with security teams. The goal is to make security an organization-wide priority, not just a technical challenge for developers to solve in isolation.

Another effective method is gamified security training, such as Capture-the-Flag (CTF) competitions and red team exercises. These approaches not only make security more engaging, but also train employees to think like attackers, helping them recognize real-world exploitation techniques before they happen. The 2025 Kodem Security Report noted that organizations adopting gamified security training saw a 30% reduction in social engineering-related security incidents compared to those relying on traditional security awareness programs [1].

By embedding security into multiple layers of the organization, companies create a security-first culture that extends beyond the development pipeline, ensuring long-term resilience against cyber threats.

Conclusion

Application security is at a crossroads. The 2025 Kodem Security Report underscores what has long been evident: developer-led security is failing. Fragmented security tools, slow remediation, and reliance on developer-driven fixes expose organizations to modern cyber threats. Instead of continuing this cycle, organizations must rethink their security strategies, shifting toward automated defenses, infrastructure-level protections, external validation, and a broader security culture.

The future of application security is not about forcing developers to be security experts—it’s about equipping organizations with the right technology, processes, and expertise to secure applications at every stage. By leveraging Application Detection & Response, RASP, auto-remediation, bug bounties, immutable infrastructure, and cross-functional security programs, companies can move beyond the reactive, developer-dependent model and toward a proactive, automated, and resilient security approach.

The message is clear: security must evolve beyond developers. Only by embracing automation, specialized security expertise, and a holistic security culture can organizations effectively defend against today’s rapidly evolving threats.

‍

‍

References

[1] Kodem Security, "The State of Application Security Workflows Report – 2025," 2025.
[2] Progress Software, "MOVEit Data Breach Incident Report," 2023.
[3] CircleCI, "Security Incident Report – January 2023," 2023.
[4] Okta, "Customer Security Incident Report," 2023.
[5] Red Hat, "XZ Utils Backdoor Threat Report," 2024.
[6] Palo Alto Networks, "Application Detection & Response Overview," 2023.
[7] Gartner, "RASP and Its Role in Modern Application Security," 2023.
[8] Google Cloud, "Best Practices for Immutable Infrastructure," 2023.
[9] HackerOne, "The Impact of Bug Bounty Programs," 2023.

‍